USPTO serial 79122830
ISPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Galbreath
John A. Galbreath Galbreath Law Offices, P.C.2516 Chestnut Woods Ct.Reisterstown, MD 21136UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Fluid collection containers for medical use, namely, containers for collecting oral fluids; non-electrical medical apparatus, excluding catheter system devices, for collecting blood; blood sampling apparatus, excluding catheter system devices, for medical use; apparatus, excluding catheter system devices, for blood analysis for medical use; apparatus, excluding catheter system devices, for collecting blood; apparatus, excluding catheter system devices, for taking blood; apparatus, excluding catheter system devices, for the drawing of blood; medical apparatus, excluding catheter system devices, for collecting a blood sample from a human patient for subsequent analysis, namely, an absorbent pad; medical apparatus, excluding catheter system devices, for collecting a blood sample from a human patient for subsequent analysis, namely, an absorbent pad and a holder; a medical procedure kit, excluding catheter system devices, for collecting a blood sample from a human patient for subsequent analysis comprising an absorbent pad and a safety lancet; a medical procedure kit for collecting a blood sample from a human patient for subsequent analysis comprising an absorbent pad, a safety lancet and an envelope and excluding catheter system devices; swabs for collecting a fluid or cellular sample from a human patient for subsequent analysis for medical use; buccal, mucosal and oral fluid swabs for sample collection for medical use; a medical procedure kit for collecting a sample from a human patient for subsequent analysis, comprising a buccal swab; a medical procedure kit for collecting a sample from a human patient for subsequent analysis, comprising a mucosal swab; a medical procedure kit for collecting a sample from a human patient for subsequent analysis, comprising a oral fluid swab | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |