Drawing for KHS

USPTO serial 79124520

KHS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4757919Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 23, 2015
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KHS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginia W. Marino

Virginia W. Marino BRINKS GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Electromechanical controllers for use in switching water supply apparatus and installations, the foregoing for use with changing drinking water supply systems for avoiding stagnation and the resultant adverse impact on drinking water quality ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Apparatus for regulating and controlling water supply apparatus and installations, in particular faucets, valves, pipes, being parts of sanitary facilities; apparatus for heating and steam generating, namely, heating boiler, water heater, plate heat exchanger for use in drinking water supply systems; plumbing fittings for drinking water supply and sanitary purposes, in particular bibs, cocks, traps, valves, water filters, and pressure sensors, temperature sensors and flow rate sensors sold as integral components of regulating and controlling apparatus for water supply, namely, water treatment plants in the nature of water purification units; all of the foregoing for use in avoiding stagnation and the resultant adverse impact on drinking water qualitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Installation and repair of water supply apparatus and installations, for the purpose of avoiding stagnation and the resultant adverse impact on drinking water qualitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Technical consultancy services relating to the design of heating, steam generating and water supply apparatus and installations, all relating to drinking water supply systems for use in avoiding stagnation and the resultant adverse impact on drinking water qualitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 23, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 20, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 2, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 24, 2022XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Mar 24, 2022XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 9, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 9, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Mar 9, 2021C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 9, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 9, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 11, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 5, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Nov 5, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Sep 23, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 23, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 7, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 7, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 18, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 18, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 18, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 2, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 20, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 21, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 2, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 2, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 11, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2014GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Feb 12, 2014GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 16, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 16, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 16, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 23, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 14, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 20, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 7, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 7, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 6, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 1, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance