USPTO serial 79124520
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Gebr. Kemper GmbH + Co. KG Metallwerke
Olpe, DE
Other trademarks owned by Gebr. Kemper GmbH + Co. KG Metallwerke
Gebr. Kemper GmbH + Co. KG; Metallwerke
DE
Other trademarks owned by Gebr. Kemper GmbH + Co. KG; Metallwerke
Gebr. Kemper GmbH + Co. KG; Metallwerke
DE
Other trademarks owned by Gebr. Kemper GmbH + Co. KG; Metallwerke
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virginia W. Marino
Virginia W. Marino BRINKS GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Electromechanical controllers for use in switching water supply apparatus and installations, the foregoing for use with changing drinking water supply systems for avoiding stagnation and the resultant adverse impact on drinking water quality ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for regulating and controlling water supply apparatus and installations, in particular faucets, valves, pipes, being parts of sanitary facilities; apparatus for heating and steam generating, namely, heating boiler, water heater, plate heat exchanger for use in drinking water supply systems; plumbing fittings for drinking water supply and sanitary purposes, in particular bibs, cocks, traps, valves, water filters, and pressure sensors, temperature sensors and flow rate sensors sold as integral components of regulating and controlling apparatus for water supply, namely, water treatment plants in the nature of water purification units; all of the foregoing for use in avoiding stagnation and the resultant adverse impact on drinking water quality | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation and repair of water supply apparatus and installations, for the purpose of avoiding stagnation and the resultant adverse impact on drinking water quality | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical consultancy services relating to the design of heating, steam generating and water supply apparatus and installations, all relating to drinking water supply systems for use in avoiding stagnation and the resultant adverse impact on drinking water quality | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 23, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |