USPTO serial 79126841
VO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
Susan Upton Douglass Fross Zelnick Lehrman and Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video servers for accessing television programs and films on demand; decoder boxes, namely, television signal decoders; electronic access cards and key cards for use with decoders; electronic apparatus and devices for controlling access to pay-television services, electronic apparatus for use in decrypting digital video signal transmissions | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Secure electronic data transmission services of television programs and films via satellite, computer terminals and the internet; provision of access to search engines, namely, providing telecommunication connections to databases; provision of access to the Internet or to local networks, Internet address routing and filtering services, namely, screening of Internet addresses for permitted access to databases and telecommunications content; rental of telecommunication apparatus and installations; broadcasting of television programs by means of telecommunications and wireless broadband, cable networks, fiber-optic networks; providing access to a bundle of television channels by computer networks, cable networks, fiber-optic networks; providing access to video on demand (VOD) services, namely, broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; providing secure access to pay TV channels, namely, pay-per-view television transmission services; telecommunication consulting and advice in the nature of technical consulting in the field of video transmission | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical assistance services for the operation and supervision of computer networks, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; research in telecommunications and broadcasting, namely, technical research services in the field of broadcast technology; computer consultation; design and development of computer systems, telecommunications and broadcasting systems for others; maintenance and updating of search engine software for a telecommunication and broadcasting network; providing planning and engineering services in the field of information and communications networks, design and development of encryption, decryption and access control systems and equipment for others for use with television and broadcast transmissions as well as all types of information transmission; consulting services in the fields of video transmission and broadcasting networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |