Drawing for RAMPANT

USPTO serial 79132946

RAMPANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAMPANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; footwear and headgear; scarves; casual trousers; jeans; jogging trousers; shorts; socks; sports socks; articles of clothing for sportswear; rugby tops; t-shirts; jumpers; sports jumpers; hats; hat frames; caps; belts; outer clothing; overcoats; swimwear; nightwear; and underwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 16, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 6, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 27, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2013CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 10, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 3, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 1, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 1, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 31, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance