Drawing for AIRFIBR

USPTO serial 79154335

AIRFIBR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AIRFIBR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Construction material for turf installation in the nature of a culture substrate composed of notably sand and synthetic fibers for use in improving sports performance or safetyACTIVE—
031Natural turf; reinforced turf. NaturalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 6, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance