Drawing for SILVENT ADVANCED AIR NOZZLE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79158192

SILVENT ADVANCED AIR NOZZLE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4779656Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 28, 2015
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SILVENT ADVANCED AIR NOZZLE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rhett V. Barney

Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes PC601 W Riverside Ave Ste 1400Spokane, WA 99201United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Compressed air blowing machines for use in cleaning, drying, cooling, sorting and transporting; power-operated industrial blowers; power operated blowers; air blowing machines; power-operated air spray guns; exhaust silencers for engines; electric air jet cleaners; blow moulds, namely, blow nozzles for generating high-pressure air or gas steams as parts of machinesACTIVE
035Advertising services; marketing services; business management; business administration; providing office functions; retail store services featuring blowing machines, industrial blowing machines, power-operated blowers, air blowers, air spray guns, mufflers, electrical apparatus for air-jet cleaning, blow moulds, namely, blow nozzles for generating high-pressure air or gas steamsACTIVE
042Consultancy services relating to product engineering; advisory services relating to computer hardware design; product development consultation; consultation services relating to interior design; professional consultancy relating to industrial design; industrial design; design of industrial machinery; development of industrial processes, namely, development of industrial process control computer softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 21, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 19, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 17, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 8, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 7, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 25, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 9, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 6, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 27, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 18, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 28, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 12, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 12, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 22, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 22, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 22, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 6, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 25, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 26, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 28, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 28, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 28, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 13, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 7, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 2, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance