Drawing for PURE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79160047

PURE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NGUYEN, NICOLE ASHLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electromedical apparatus and equipment, namely, medical imaging apparatus for angiography and cardiology and structural and replacement parts thereforSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 24, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 21, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 13, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 13, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 23, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 18, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 18, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 14, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 18, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 17, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance