Drawing for GMC SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 79173878

GMC SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5126186Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2017
Examiner
GALAN, MATTHEW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GMC SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore R. Remaklus

Theodore R. Remaklus Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P.441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for customizing electronic communication systems and digital printing systemsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunications, namely, electronic mail and message sendingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design, development and maintenance of software for customized communication systems and digital printing systems, as well as consultation concerning software migration, software integration and software installationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 6, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 13, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 4, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 29, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 23, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 20, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 24, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 16, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2016OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 22, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Aug 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 14, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 13, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance