USPTO serial 79180038
STARLIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5056889Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2016
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with STARLIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-42048 RUBIERA (RE), IT
I-42048 RUBIERA (RE), IT
I-42048 RUBIERA (RE), IT
IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith R. Obert
Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP55 Corporate Drive, Third FloorTrumbull, CT 06611United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Adhesives for use in industry; unprocessed artificial resins and artificial resins products, namely, unprocessed artificial resins as raw materials in the form of powders, liquids or pastes; preparations, namely, concrete preservatives except paints and oils, and chemical compositions for the preservation or waterproofing of cement; ] adhesives for wall tiles and floorings | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, [ mortar, grout, cement, ] epoxy grout for ceramic tiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LITOKOL S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by LITOKOL S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by LITOKOL S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by LITOKOL LAB S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named STARLIKE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |