Drawing for DATAPEN

USPTO serial 79180792

DATAPEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATAPEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Beth E. Cooperstein

Beth E. Cooperstein Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Att'n: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments for providing drug delivery; injectors for medical use, namely medical fluid injectorSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 6, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 27, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 21, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 13, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 8, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 1, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 29, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance