Drawing for HIMARK

USPTO serial 79187483

HIMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HIMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air conditioning apparatus; extractor hoods for kitchens; heating apparatus; taps faucets; heating installations water; water-pipes for sanitary installations; bath tubs; bath fittings; bath installations; toilet seats; bath installations (sauna -); shower cubicles enclosures (am.); sinks; water purification installations; purification installations for sewageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance