Drawing for ROSSANA

USPTO serial 79191189

ROSSANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5357001Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2017
Examiner
JONES, JACQUELYN ANDREA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ROSSANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Alexander Nolte

N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101Scarsdale, NY 10583United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035[ Commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others; commercial and industrial management assistance; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes concerning furniture for the home; ] retail and wholesale store services through [ shops, global computer networks, and ] electronic and web-based catalogues [ , mail order catalogs, telephone, radio and television, including via other electronic means of communication, namely, facsimile featuring furniture for the home, including cupboards, tables, coffee tables, dressing tables and bedside tables, bookshelves, chairs, armchairs, divans, shelves and panels for furniture, showcases in the nature of furniture, drawers and chests of drawers, beds and bed slats, ladders of wood, mirrors, clothes hangers, and office furniture, including chairs, desks and built-in furniture; presentation of goods by any means of communications for retailing purposes in the nature of promoting the goods and services of others ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2025INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 10, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 17, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 26, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 13, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 13, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2023CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 16, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 11, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 19, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Apr 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance