USPTO serial 79201164
DROID KEEPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DROID KEEPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VG
PA
PA
AE
GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer utility software; downloadable computer software programs for improving performance of portable computers and smartphones | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Development and design of computer hardware and software; computer system analysis; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; recovery of computer data; interior design; packaging design; off-site data backup; technical research in the field of improving performance of portable computers and smartphones; research and development of new products for others; mechanical research; duplication of computer programs; electronic data storage; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; providing search engines for the internet; engineering; installation of computer software; computer programming; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; computer security consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; information technology (IT) consultancy; computer technology consultancy; computer software consultancy; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; web site design consultancy; quality control for others; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; computer virus protection services; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in the field of improving performance of portable computers and smartphones; design of interior decor; computer software design; rental of web servers; computer rental; rental of computer software; industrial design; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer system design; technical writing; creating and maintaining web sites for others; technological consultancy in the field of improving performance of portable computers and smartphones; cloud computing, namely, cloud hosting provider services; server hosting; styling, namely, industrial design; graphic arts design; all of the above limited to the field of improving performance of portable computers and smartphones | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KROMTECH ALLIANCE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by HighlyRecommended S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by HighlyRecommended S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Clario DMCC
- Other trademarks owned by Clario Tech Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DROID KEEPER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |