Drawing for BLEND COLLECTIVE}

USPTO serial 79215243

BLEND COLLECTIVE}

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BLEND COLLECTIVE}?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated toiletries; cosmetic preparations; essential oils; hand and body creams; skin care preparations; preparations for application to the skin, scalp, hair or nails; deodorants for use on the person; antiperspirants; perfumes; body sprays and eau de cologne; toilet water; depilatory preparations; toilet articles; shampoos; soaps; sun-tanning preparations; bath salts (not for medical purposes); beauty masks; cleansing masks; non-medicated talcum powder for toilet purposes; styling preparations for hair; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; cosmetic preparations for the care of babies' and infants' bodies; cushions impregnated with fragrant substances; room fragrances; room perfume sprays; preparations for perfuming or fragrancing the air; refills for electric fragrance dispensers; fragrancing sachets; disposable wipes impregnated with fragrances or chemicals for household purposes; incense; scent diffusers and potpourri sachets for incorporating into aromatherapy pillows; facial wipes impregnated with cosmetics; finger wipes impregnated with cleansing preparations; make-up removal wipes textile impregnated with cosmetics; make-up removal wipes paper impregnated with cosmetics; moist wipes impregnated with a cosmetic lotion; wipes incorporating cleaning preparations; disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for personal useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 11, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 29, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 8, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 7, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance