USPTO serial 79216533
DICE 81
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DICE 81?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Games software; software programs for video games; interactive video game programs; software cartridges for computer games; software cartridges for video games; software; educational software; application software; community software; computer telephony software; interactive computer software; communication software; programs for computers; electronic components for gambling machines; games cartridges for use with electronic games apparatus; juke boxes; automated teller machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games; sports games; manipulative games; mechanical games; musical games; electronic games; parlor games; board games; quiz games; apparatus for games; arcade games; skill and action games; electronic hand-held game units; handheld computer games; lottery wheels; lottery tickets; slot machines; automatic gaming machines; coin-operated amusement machines; bill-operated gaming equipment; LCD game machines; counters for games; amusement apparatus for use in arcades | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Gambling; operating lotteries; prize draws; organising and conducting lotteries; games equipment rental; casino services; leasing of casino games; providing of casino and gaming facilities; casino, gaming and gambling services; providing amusement arcade services; video arcade services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eagle Investment SICAV plc, acting on behalf of ITT FUND
- Other trademarks owned by EAGLELINE LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DICE 81
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 10, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |