USPTO serial 79227861
BREATH BRINGING REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE TO ALLERGY TREATMENT FOR HEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BREATH BRINGING REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE TO ALLERGY TREATMENT FOR HEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeannine A Rittenhouse
Jeannine A Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights RoadSuite 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Training services in the field of treating allergies; publication of medical information and studies namely publishing and issuing of scientific papers in the field of allergies, online electronic publishing of texts and studies in the field of allergies; organization and conducting of colloquiums and conferences in the field of allergies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical and scientific research in the field of allergy treatment; conducting clinical trials for other in the field of allergy treatment; medical research namely, conducting studies on patients in the field of allergies; medical research, namely, conducting studies in the medical field; study program in the medical field namely medical and pharmaceutical studies in the field of allergies | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Provision of medical and pharmaceutical information on the Internet and via any medium | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |