Drawing for PREDICTRX

USPTO serial 79229729

PREDICTRX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PREDICTRX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane S. Berman

JANE S BERMAN TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP111 EAST WACKER DR STE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical analysis services for cancer prognosis and treatment; medical testing services, namely, the testing of cells to optimise treatment for cancer; providing medical information to patients and medical professionals in the form of reports relating to the testing of cancer cells and the treatment of cancer; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to the aforesaidABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 15, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 15, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 15, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 28, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 4, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 3, 2018OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 12, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 11, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 6, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance