Drawing for NUTRISANTOS

USPTO serial 79241176

NUTRISANTOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5952202Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 7, 2020
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NUTRISANTOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Connor W. Oswalt

Connor W. Oswalt IpHorgan Ltd.195 Arlington Heights Road, Suite #125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and apparatus for food and beverage processing and preparation for household, commercial or industrial use, namely, electric machines and apparatus for [cutting, blending, kneading, chopping, pounding, crushing,] pressing, [slicing, grinding, spraying, shredding, milling, emulsifying, mixing, beating, mincing, grating, peeling, thinning and liquefying; electric food processors; electric kitchen tools, namely, electric food drying machines, electric nut and bean grinders; centrifuge machines; ] electric citrus juicers; electric fruit and vegetable presses for household or industrial use; [electric mixers kitchen apparatus]; electric juice extractors; electric fruit juice extractors; electric machines for making beverages; [electric mixers for liquids machines]; electromechanical apparatus for beverage preparation [; electric whisks for food for household or industrial purposes; electric ice crushers; electric ice crushing machines; electric food choppers; electric graters; electric standing mixers; electric vegetable slicers; electric coffee grinders; machines for coffee extraction; ice turbines]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 9, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 22, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 7, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance