Drawing for OPLOFT

USPTO serial 79245242

OPLOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5784338Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 25, 2019
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OPLOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Stands specially adapted for computer equipment, namely, stands for desktop computers, computer screens, computer mice, computer laptops; stands of adjustable height specifically adapted for computer equipment, namely, stands of adjustable height for desktop computers, computer screens, computer mice, computer laptopsACTIVE—
020Furniture; office furniture; desks and tables; standing desks; desks of adjustable height; computer desks; furniture in the nature of personal computer work station desks; furniture in the nature of portable work surface desksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 23, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 22, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 17, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 25, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 9, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2019NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 25, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 24, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance