USPTO serial 79257954
ELISIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELISIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony P. Venturino
Anthony P. Venturino Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLAW@VORYSColumbus, OH 43216-2255Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus; computer software applications, downloadable, namely, Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application enabling access to every information concerning the driven vehicle, driving style, infotainment and possible problems, regarding the route followed and the surrounding area; compasses for measuring; computer hardware; steering apparatus, automatic, for vehicles, namely, computer hardware and operational software for steering vehicles; automatic steering wheels for vehicles; microprocessors; computer programs, recorded, namely, computer programs, recorded, in the nature of a mobile application enabling access to every information concerning the driven vehicle, driving style, infotainment and possible problems, regarding the route followed and the surrounding area; computer programs, recorded for enabling access to every information concerning the driven vehicle, driving style, infotainment and possible problems, regarding the route followed and the surrounding area; computer software, recorded, namely, computer software, recorded, in the nature of a mobile application for enabling access to every information concerning the driven vehicle, driving style, infotainment and possible problems, regarding the route followed and the surrounding area; games software; alarms, namely, acoustic alarms and anti-intrusion alarms relating to infotainment and possible problems concerning the driven vehicle, the route followed and the surrounding area | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Updating of computer software; electronic data storage; cloud computing, namely, cloud hosting provider services; cloud computing featuring software for enabling access to every information concerning the driven vehicle, driving style, infotainment and possible problems, regarding the route followed and the surrounding area; computer software consultancy; quality control; computer software design; engineering services; installation of computer software; rental of computer software; maintenance of computer software; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; design of information technology systems; recovery of computer data; research and development of new products for others; scientific research; technical research; off-site data backup; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; software as a service (SaaS), namely, hosting software for use by others for use enabling access to every information concerning the driven vehicle, driving style, infotainment and possible problems, regarding the route followed and the surrounding area; conducting technical project studies in the field of collecting, providing and accessing information concerning the driven vehicle, driving style, infotainment and possible problems, regarding the route followed and the surrounding area | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal administration of licenses; licensing of intellectual property; legal services, namely, licensing of computer software; physical security consultancy; copyright management; inspection of factories for safety purposes; legal services, namely, domain name registration; tracking of stolen property; on-line social networking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 11, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |