USPTO serial 79261651
FIREBLADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HISER, CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIREBLADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caleb L Green
8330 Skye Creek Ave.Las Vegas, NV 89113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Back supports being weightlifting belts for weightlifters; backboards for basketball; badminton game playing equipment; badminton nets; badminton rackets; badminton racquets; table tennis balls; table tennis bats; table tennis net posts; table tennis nets; table tennis paddle cases; table tennis paddles; specially shaped table tennis racket covers; table tennis tables; table tennis; tables for table tennis; table-tennis balls; tennis bags specially shaped to contain a racket; tennis ball retrievers; tennis ball serving machines; tennis ball throwing apparatus; tennis ball throwing machines; tennis balls; not soft tennis ball balls; tennis nets; tennis nets and uprights; tennis racket covers; tennis racket presses; tennis racket strings; tennis rackets; tennis racquet strings; tennis racquets; tennis uprights; tennis uprights; racket cases; racket cases for tennis or badminton; specially adapted racket covers; racket grip tape; racketball balls; racketball racket strings; racketball rackets; racketballs; rackets; tennis rackets; strings for racquet; racquet ball gloves; racquet ball nets; racquet strings; racquets; sport balls; sport hoops; namely, basketball hoops; sportballs; sporting articles and equipment, namely, soccer balls; basketballs; tennis balls; sports balls; sports bows archery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |