USPTO serial 79267824
QUADRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, JUSTINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUADRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Data security consultancy; data encryption and decryption services; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; digitization of documents; electronic data storage; cloud computing; rental of web servers; electronic monitoring of credit card activity to detect fraud via the internet; creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others [information technology services]; web site design consultancy; information technology [IT] consultancy; internet security consultancy; providing search engines for the internet; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; research and development of new products for others; off-site data backup; platform as a service [PaaS]; computer technology consultancy; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; computer rental, software update; recovery of computer data; computer security consultancy; development of computer platforms; duplication of computer programs; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; computer system design; computer system analysis; rental of computer software; computer virus protection services; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; computer programming; computer software consultancy; electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the internet; server hosting; updating of computer software; software development in the framework of software publishing; maintenance of computer software; software as a service [SaaS]; installation of computer software; computer software design; technological consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; creating and maintaining web sites for others; hosting computer sites [web sites] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 5, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |