USPTO serial 79278810
ROSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OAKES, ANNA JENNIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and application software; software and application software, downloadable or not, for cloud computers and computer hardware; displays and touch screens; monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Commercial intermediary services and consulting relating to the sale of application software, equipment, screens, touch screens and monitors, whether or not via the Internet (so-called online shops) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, writing, updating and management of software and application software; automation services and services of IT specialists; advice related to cloud computing and its applications; provision of hosting services with respect to cloud computing; design and development of operating software enabling access to cloud computing networks and use thereof; programming of operating software enabling access to cloud computing networks and use thereof; rental of operating software enabling access to cloud computing networks and use thereof; provision of virtual computer environments via cloud computing; installation, repair, maintenance, updating, upgrading of software and application software; provision of advice with respect to the aforesaid services; technical advice related to installation, repair and maintenance of software and application software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2020 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |