Drawing for TWIN.TEC

USPTO serial 79320106

TWIN.TEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOO, JEANE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TWIN.TEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Hurley

David Hurley Knechtel, Demeur & Samlan525 West Monroe Street, Suite 2360Chicago, IL 60661UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment, apparatus and instruments for scientific and laboratory purposes, namely, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) plates for use in thermal cyclers and real-time PCR detection systems for use in PCR workflows in laboratoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2022MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Nov 8, 2022MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Nov 8, 2022ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 18, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 19, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2021RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2021RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 24, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 21, 2021RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance