USPTO serial 79320772
MAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALBO, AMANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Alexander Nolte
N. Alexander Nolte NOLTE LACKENBACH SIEGEL1 Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots for working glass; industrial robots for working wood; industrial robots for working metal; industrial robots for working plastic material; industrial robots for use in manufacture; industrial robots for shaping plastic material; industrial robots for shaping wood; industrial robots for shaping glass; industrial robots for shaping metal; industrial robots for use in the handling of workpieces; industrial robots for use in the mounting of workpieces to be worked on; unmanned industrial robots for machine tools; robotic mechanisms in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for working glass; robotic mechanisms being parts of unmanned industrial robots, namely, parts of loading-unloading machines and apparatus; robotic mechanisms in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for working metal; robotic mechanisms in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for working plastic material; robotic mechanisms in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for working wood; robotic mechanisms in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for shaping plastic material; robotic mechanisms in the nature of autonomous industrial robots for shaping metal; robotic mechanisms in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for shaping wood; robotic mechanisms in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for shaping glass; robotic mechanisms in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for use in processing food; robotic apparatus in the nature of unmanned industrial robots for handling materials; robotic arms for industrial purposes being parts of unmanned industrial robots; unmanned industrial robots for transferring workpieces; unmanned industrial robots for handling rods; unmanned industrial robots for feeding workpieces; unmanned industrial robots with articulated arms for manipulating workpieces; unmanned industrial robots for conveying materials; unmanned industrial robots for welding | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Motion, torque, force, proximity, sound, pressure, contact and encoder sensors for use with machine tools; privacy protection sensors in the nature of motion sensors, sound sensors, pressure sensors, contact sensors, and contact recognizing sensors; internet of things (IoT) sensors, namely, motion, torque, proximity, sound, pressure, contact and encoder sensors for internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; artificial intelligence software for healthcare, namely, downloadable sensor software using artificial intelligence for operating healthcare (IoT) motion, sound, pressure, contact, recognizing sensors in the field of healthcare | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological research relating to the computerised automation of industrial processes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |