USPTO serial 79397467
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice Housey
Janice Housey Litmus Law PLLC4 Weems Lane #240Winchester, VA 22601United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polymer beads for use in manufacturing; polymer solutions in the nature of unprocessed polymer compositions; unprocessed biodegradable polymer compositions; polymer resins, unprocessed; unprocessed reactive liquid polymer compositions; unprocessed water absorbing polymers; unprocessed reinforced polymers; unprocessed synthetic polymers; chemical compounds for use in the manufacture of polymers; chemical preparations being plastisizers for use in natural polymers; chemicals for use in the manufacture of flame retardant polymers. | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Semi-processed synthetic polymer resins; semi-processed thermoplastic polymer resins for use in manufacture; polymer films for use in manufacture; semi-processed plastic goods being semi-processed plastics for use in manufacturing in the form of posts, barriers, fences, rack protectors, gates, skirting boards and wheel stoppers to protect machines, buildings, motor cars, balustrades and railings; semi- processed plastic goods being semi-processed plastics for use in manufacturing in the form of posts, barriers, fences, rack protectors, gates, skirting boards and wheel stoppers for protection against collision; shock-absorbing materials, namely, extruded plastic in the form of bumpers for use in the further manufacture of items to prevent body injuries and damages, and to protect infrastructures for machines, buildings, cars, balustrades and railings | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2024 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2024 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |