Drawing for ORGANIC COLOR PLAY BY SAVERGLASS

USPTO serial 79975203

ORGANIC COLOR PLAY BY SAVERGLASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4152439Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2012
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANIC COLOR PLAY BY SAVERGLASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean R. Karau

Dean R. Karau Fredrikson & Byron, P.A200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Treatment of materials, namely, silk screen printing of packaging of glass, tinting glass by surface treatmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 18, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 23, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 11, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 11, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 19, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2012FISNFINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 29, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 29, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2011ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2011MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Nov 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 29, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 22, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 9, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 9, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance