USPTO serial 79975457
BOOKING.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2021
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD,CAITLIN C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BOOKING.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Moskin and Katherine P. Califa
Jonathan Moskin and Katherine P. Califa FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K St. NWSuite 600Washington, DC 20007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Making hotel reservations for others; holiday accommodation reservation services and resort reservation services, namely, providing hotel room reservation services and resort hotel reservation services and providing online hotel and resort hotel room reservation services; providing information about hotels, holiday accommodations and resorts accommodations, whether or not based on the valuation of customers; providing information, advice and consultancy relating making hotel reservations and temporary accommodation reservations; providing online information, advice and consultancy relating making hotel reservations and temporary accommodation reservations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2026 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2019 | CORS | CORRECTION REQUEST SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | ISCO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |