Drawing for 21C

USPTO serial 85003287

21C

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 21C?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara J. Grahn, Esq.

Barbara J. Grahn, Esq. Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPSuite 3300; 45 South 7th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Flour; oat flour; wheat flour; processed oats; coated oats; coated whole grains; granola clusters; cereal clusters; oat clusters; whole grain clusters; processed oats, namely, oat groats, quick oats, and old fashioned oats; rolled oats; instant oats; oat flakes; processed wheat; processed grains; bakery goods, namely, breads, buns, rolls, cakes, sweet goods, granola snack bars; cereal-based snack bars; cookies; crackers; pizza crust; processed cereal; tortillas; corn chips; flour-based chips; grain-based chips; pita chips; taco chips; tortilla chips; bagel chips; pitas; Wheat-based snack foods; food grade processed corn; grain-based snack foods; cereal-based snack foods; oat-based snack foodsACTIVE—
031Raw corn; fresh corn; food grade unprocessed corn; raw wheat; agricultural seeds; agricultural grains for planting; unprocessed oatsACTIVE—
040Grain processing services; cereal processing services; flour, oat, and corn milling servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 9, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance