USPTO serial 85026862
TECHTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monique Cheng Joe
Monique Cheng Joe NBCUniversal Media, LLC100 Universal City Plaza1280/6Universal City, CA 91608Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting and transmission of television, cable, video-on-demand, digital, satellite, wireless, mobile, and Internet programs, segments and content; broadcasting, distribution and transmission of programs, segments and content for wireless, cellular and mobile devices; television broadcasting and transmission services; cable television broadcasting and transmission services; streaming of audio and video content; transmission of podcasts in the fields of entertainment, the Internet, video games, computer games, wireless games, gaming, animation, computers, software, technologies, electronics, and news and streaming of audio and video content | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production and programming of television, cable, video-on-demand, digital, satellite, wireless, mobile, and Internet programs, segments and content; production and exhibition of non-downloadable audio and video content in the fields of entertainment news, the Internet, video games, computer games, wireless games, gaming, animation, computers, software, technologies, electronics, and current events news for a global communications network and wireless networks; programming of television shows; production of television shows; providing ongoing television programs in the fields of entertainment news, the Internet, video games, computer games, wireless games, gaming, animation, computers, software, technologies, electronics, and current events news; providing online journals, namely, blogs in the fields of the entertainment industry, the Internet, video games, computer games, wireless games, gaming, animation, computers, software, technologies, electronics, and current events news; providing online video and audio features in the nature of a continuing show broadcast over the Internet in the fields of the entertainment industry, the Internet, video games, computer games, wireless games, gaming, animation, computers, software, technologies, electronics, and current events news; providing non-downloadable audio content, namely, ongoing radio programs in the fields of the entertainment industry, the Internet, video games, computer games, wireless games, gaming, animation, computers, software, technologies, electronics, and current events news; providing non-downloadable video content, namely, ongoing video programs in the fields of the entertainment industry, the Internet, video games, computer games, wireless games, gaming, animation, computers, software, technologies, electronics, and current events news; providing entertainment information; providing information about video games, computer games, wireless games, gaming, and news in the nature of current event reporting available via wireless and mobile devices; video filming and recording; providing information regarding the foregoing via the internet; distribution of television, cable, video-on-demand, digital, satellite, wireless, mobile, and Internet programs, segments, and content | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information in the fields of technology and software development via wireless and mobile devices; providing technology information about the Internet and electronics via wireless and mobile devices; providing information in the field of animation design via wireless and mobile devices; providing information regarding Internet technology via wireless and mobile devices and the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by G4 Media, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by G4 MEDIA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by G4 MEDIA, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TECHTV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |