CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ZANSORS

USPTO serial 85051045

ZANSORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZANSORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Micul E. Thompson

MICUL E. THOMPSON ZANSORS LLC1804 BALDWIN DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic sensors for physical, biological, and chemical conditions and substances; microelectronic integrated circuitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 24, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 14, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance