Drawing for QMAX

USPTO serial 85058315

QMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jody H. Drake

JODY H. DRAKE SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Windshield wiper blades for automobiles; windshield wipers for automobiles; windshield wipers for front-glass of automobilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 24, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 31, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 26, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 9, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2010AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance