Drawing for CHIPS HAPPEN

USPTO serial 85061371

CHIPS HAPPEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIPS HAPPEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gordon G. Waggett, Esq.

Gordon G. Waggett, Esq. GORDON G. WAGGETT, P.C.228 West Cowan DriveHouston, TX 77007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025ShirtsACTIVEOct 7, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 20, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 13, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 15, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 20, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 28, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 28, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 28, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 28, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance