USPTO serial 85061371
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gordon G. Waggett, Esq.
Gordon G. Waggett, Esq. GORDON G. WAGGETT, P.C.228 West Cowan DriveHouston, TX 77007UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |