Drawing for TREKTEK

USPTO serial 85070791

TREKTEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREKTEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard C. Woodbridge

RICHARD C. WOODBRIDGE FOX ROTHSCHILD LLPPO BOX 5231PRINCETON, NJ 08543-5231UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018BACKPACKS AND DRY BAGSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 29, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 14, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 14, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance