USPTO serial 85082366
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore R. Remaklus
THEODORE R. REMAKLUS THEODORE R. REMAKLUS441 VINE STREET2700 CAREW TOWERCINCINNATI, OH 45202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring cups; measuring spoons; one hour timers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric heating units for buffet server; heat lamps for warming food; electric slow cookers; electric kettles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Non-motorized dollies and carts, non-motorized carts housing individual food warming units for institutional use; carts for holding catering equipment, namely, pan and tray carriers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic anti-slip gripper mats for holding crockery and cutlery in place, bottle racks, brush and broom storage racks, plastic storage containers and lids for food storage in the commercial and institutional service industries, ware washing racks, namely, cup racks, flatware racks, plate racks, and non-metal storage bins | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Dinnerware, plates, bowls, server platters, cups and saucers, mugs, dish covers, plastic utensils, namely, cups, saucers, plates and bowls, plastic tableware, beverageware, beverage glassware, wine glasses, goblets, coffee servers, tea pots, cream pitchers, sugar bowls, insulated food service ware, namely, mugs, soup bowls, desert bowls, food plates, covers for food plates, and domed food plate covers, dishes for dessert, cheese graters, sugar pourers, gravy boats, salt and pepper shakers, bud vases, beverage urns, pans for water, divided food pans, serving tongs, serving spoons, serving forks, kitchen ladles, punch bowls, cake servers and cake stands, serving trays, bottle holders, namely, bottle stands, pitchers and lids, pourer dispensers for liquors, champagne buckets, coolers for wine and juice, ice scoops, cocktail shakers, bottle openers, paper cup dispensers, dispensers for dispensing cup lids, beverageware dispensers, portable beverage dispensers, toothpick dispensers, straw dispensers, packet dispensers, condiment pump dispensers, condiment squeeze bottles sold empty, all-purpose portable household containers, cookware, namely, pots and pans, sauce pots, sauce pans, sauté pans, lids for pans, stock pots, steamer baskets, double boilers, pasta cookers, non-electric fryer pans and baskets, double roaster pans, baking pans, roasting pans, pans for baking buns, cookie sheet pans, pie pans, bread pans, muffin tins and pizza pans, cutting boards, pastry brushes, basting brushes for meats, cleaning brushes for mushrooms, cleaning brushes for vegetables, utility brushes, namely, cleaning brushes for household use, brushes for washing up, namely, hand and nail brushes, bottle brushes for cleaning the insides of bottles, dish washing brushes, scrubbing brushes, cooking strainers, spatulas, pan scrapers, colanders, household utensils, namely, wire mesh skimmers, spaghetti cooking strainers, meat tenderizers, crumb sweepers, brooms, dusting brushes, dust pans, floor scrub brushes, cleaning brushes for tile and grout, dusters and wall and ceiling fan dusters, mops, window and floor squeegees, sponges for household purposes, trash cans, refuse and recycling bins, general purpose non-metal bins for food service use, all of the above for use in the commercial and institutional service industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Towels, tablecloths of textiles, fabric table runners, placemats not of paper, table pads, washing mitts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepackaged condiments, namely, salt, pepper, sugar, tea and coffee | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |