Drawing for ORTHO-PEDIC

USPTO serial 85083690

ORTHO-PEDIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORTHO-PEDIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Loren Donald Pearson

Loren Donald Pearson Pearson IP333 SE 2nd AvenueSuite 2000Miami, FL 33131-2185

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020sleep products, namely, beds, mattresses, wood bedsteads, mattress toppers, pillows; mattress support systems in the nature of mattress foundations, bed frames, and bed headboards; viscoelastic foam mattresses, viscoelastic foam mattress toppers, non-therapeutic pet beds, and non-therapeutic viscoelastic foam bet bedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 28, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 27, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 23, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 23, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 24, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 24, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 26, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance