Drawing for SIMX

USPTO serial 85148606

SIMX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Drangel

JASON M. DRANGEL EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP60 EAST 42ND STREET, SUITE 2410NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Voting services, namely, services allowing users to cast votes in contests using telephones and mobile devices; Organizing and conducting business competitions relating to presentations, business plans, business ventures and investment opportunities; Organizing and conducting opinion polls relating to presentations, business plans, business ventures and investment opportunities; Providing a website that enables users to provide feedback in opinion polls relating to presentations, business plans, business ventures and investment opportunitiesACTIVE—
042Providing a website with non-downloadable software that enables users to cast votes on-line in voting competitions relating to presentations, business plans, business ventures and investment opportunitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 27, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance