USPTO serial 85180587
MO-DV MOBILE DIGITAL VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MO-DV MOBILE DIGITAL VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Campbell, CA
Campbell, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan Jeanne
Megan Jeanne The Corporate Law Group1342 Rollins RoadBurlingame, CA 94010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING DIGITAL DATA IN THE NATURE OF COPY PROTECTED DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT, NAMELY, MOVIES, VIDEO, AUDIO, MUSIC, VOICE, TEXT, IMAGES, PICTURES, GRAPHICS, ELECTRONIC BOOKS, AND OTHER DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT FROM A DISTRIBUTION SOURCE TO CONSUMER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, SMART PHONE SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, TABLET COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, PERSONAL COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, AND OTHER RENDERING DEVISED HAVING SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA; RETAIL STORE SERVICES PROVIDED VIA KIOSKS FEATURING DIGITAL CONTENT, NAMELY, COPY PROTECTED DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT, NAMELY, MOVIES, VIDEO, AUDIO, MUSIC, VOICE, TEXT, IMAGES, PICTURES, GRAPHICS, ELECTRONIC BOOKS, AND OTHER DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT FROM A DISTRIBUTION SOURCE TO CONSUMER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, SMART PHONE SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, TABLET COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, PERSONAL COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, AND OTHER RENDERING DEVICES HAVING SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA; ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING COPY PROTECTED DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT, NAMELY, MOVIES, VIDEO, AUDIO, MUSIC, VOICE, TEXT, IMAGES, PICTURES, GRAPHICS, ELECTRONIC BOOKS, AND OTHER DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR THE INTERNET FROM A DISTRIBUTION SOURCE TO CONSUMER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, SMART PHONE SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, TABLET COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, PERSONAL COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, AND OTHER RENDERING DEVICES HAVING SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | KIOSK BASED COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF THE DIGITAL DATA IN THE NATURE OF COPY PROTECTED DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT, NAMELY, MOVIES, VIDEO, AUDIO, MUSIC, VOICE, TEXT, IMAGES, PICTURES, GRAPHICS, ELECTRONIC BOOKS, AND OTHER DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT SENT FROM A DISTRIBUTION SOURCE TO CONSUMER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, SMART PHONE SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, TABLET COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, PERSONAL COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, AND OTHER RENDERING DEVICES HAVING SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA; DIGITAL CONTENT STORAGE SERVICE FOR SOLID-STATE FLASH MEMORY DEVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF DIGITAL DATA FOR USE IN SOLID-STATE FLASH MEMORY DEVICES IN THE NATURE OF COPY PROTECTED DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT, NAMELY, MOVIES, VIDEO, AUDIO, MUSIC, VOICE, TEXT, IMAGES, PICTURES, GRAPHICS, ELECTRONIC BOOKS, AND OTHER DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT FROM A DISTRIBUTION SOURCE TO CONSUMER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, SMART PHONE SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, TABLET COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, PERSONAL COMPUTER SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA, AND OTHER RENDERING DEVICES HAVING SOLID STATE ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |