USPTO serial 85226465
FELLINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4366138Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2013
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FELLINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sergei Orel
SERGEI OREL LAW OFFICE OF SERGEI OREL LLC7000 J F KENNEDY BLVD E STE M-21DLOWER LEVEL MALLGUTTENBERG, NJ 07093Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages containing fruit; Alcoholic beverages of fruit; Alcoholic beverages, namely, digestifs; Alcoholic cocktail mixes; Alcoholic extracts; Alcoholic fruit cocktail drinks; Alcoholic mixed beverages except beers; Brandy; Gin; Prepared alcoholic cocktail; Vodka; Whisky | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 6, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 6, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |