USPTO serial 85249657
HOT CHILLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOT CHILLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca B. Lederhouse
REBECCA B LEDERHOUSE BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 E RANDOLPH STREETSUITE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60601-6342Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video-game machines for use with external display screen or monitor, and replacement parts for use with the machines, namely, power cables, interactive remote control units and memory cards; computer game programs, electronic components for slot machines; automatic slot machines; Automatic game machines and gaming machines, namely, electronic slot and bingo machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |