USPTO serial 85251845
LOVELY BY CRISTOPHE FOR DENISE RICHARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOVELY BY CRISTOPHE FOR DENISE RICHARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Baby hair conditioner; Bleaching preparations for the hair; Conditioners; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic hair filling powders for covering bald and thinning spots on the scalp; Cosmetic hair regrowth inhibiting preparations; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Exfoliants for hair; Gel for hair; Hair balsam; Hair bleach; Hair bleaches; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care creams; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, hair; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Hair care products, namely, heat protection sprays; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair colorants; Hair coloring preparations; Hair colourants; Hair colouring; Hair colouring and dyes; Hair colouring preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair conditioners for babies; Hair creams; Hair curling preparations; Hair decolorants; Hair dressings for men; Hair dressings for women; Hair dye; Hair dyes; Hair emollients; Hair fixers; Hair frosts; Hair gel; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair gels; Hair glaze; Hair lacquers; Hair lighteners; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hair mascara; Hair masks; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair piece bonding glue; Hair pomades; Hair products, namely, thickening control creams; Hair relaxers; Hair relaxing preparations; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sheen spray; Hair spray; Hair sprays; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling fixative in the nature of hair wax; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair tonic; Hair tonics; Hair waving lotion; Hair waving preparations; Hair-washing powder; Hydrogen peroxide for use on the hair; Lotions for hair; Mousse for hair; Non-medicated balms for use on hair; Non-medicated hair restoration lotions; Non-medicated hair serums; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Non-medicated serums for use on hair; Non-medicated hair care preparations; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Pomades for hair; Preparations for permanent hair waves; Preparations for setting hair; Styling clay for hair; Styling foam for hair; Styling paste for hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |