Drawing for PUFF DADDY & THE FAMILY

USPTO serial 85258734

PUFF DADDY & THE FAMILY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUFF DADDY & THE FAMILY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Ross

Richard Ross Perkins Coie LLP1201 Third Avenue,Suite 4900Seattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio-visual recordings featuring music and musical based entertainment; downloadable audio-visual recordings featuring music and musical based entertainmentACTIVE—
025Jackets excluding padded jackets, pants, coats, bandanas, sweatshirts, footwear and fashion accessories, namely, belts, ties, gloves, scarves, socks, hosiery, underwear, boxer shorts and women's lingerieACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, live musical performances by a musical groupACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 9, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance