USPTO serial 85267553
INSERT STUFF FRAMEWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSERT STUFF FRAMEWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daryl W Schnurr
DARYL W SCHNURR MILLER THOMSON LLP295 HAGEY BLVD.SUITE 300WATERLOO, ON, N2L6R5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and computer program platforms for creating and conducting educational courses and seminars, for generating course and related instructional material for online use at all learning levels, for enabling payment, registration, self assessment, course administration, experience and student evaluations, interactive communications and for training users on the use and operation of the foregoing | ACTIVE | Apr 14, 2014 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, hosting online web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online gatherings and interactive discussions; computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow users to publish and share their own content and images online, including electronic learning programs and platforms; design and development of computer hardware and software for electronic learning programs and platforms | ACTIVE | Apr 14, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Desire2Learn Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Desire2Learn Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INSERT STUFF FRAMEWORK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 12, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |