Drawing for BUMP

USPTO serial 85289669

BUMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gavin Charslton

1600 Amphitheatre ParkwayMountain View, CA 94043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for exchanging, distributing, pushing, collecting, managing, transmitting or otherwise sending data, information, messages, digital content, media content, software applications, geographical and location information, calendar events, social media information, coupons and marketing and promotional information to, between and among computing, electronic and mobile devices; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) and software development kits (SDKs) software for use in building software applications; providing an interactive web site featuring technology that allows users to search, exchange, distribute, collect, manage, transmit or otherwise send data, information, messages, digital content, media content, software applications, geographical and location information, calendar events, social media information, coupons and marketing and promotional informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 21, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 18, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 13, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 22, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 2, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 28, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 14, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2013WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2013WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 6, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance