USPTO serial 85347014
VIRTUAL BATTERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRTUAL BATTERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Mowers
MATTHEW R MOWERS BROOKS KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | POWER DISTRIBUTION OR CONTROL MACHINES AND APPARATUS, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION UNITS; BATTERY CHARGERS AND CYCLERS; ELECTRICITY INVERTERS AND CONVERTERS; AC AND DC ELECTRONIC MOTOR CONTROLLERS; BATTERY THERMAL CONTROLLERS; BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (BMS) COMPRISING TEMPERATURE MONITORS, VOLTAGE MONITORS, MICROCOMPUTER UNITS; BATTERY CHARGER CONTROLLER; AC TO DC CONVERTERS; DC TO DC CONVERTERS; DC TO AC INVERTERS; POWER CONDITIONING UNITS COMPRISING INVERTERS, MICROCONVERTERS, MICROINVERTERS FOR REDUCED RIPPLE, SYMMETRY AND EQUALIZATION; MEASURING OR TESTING INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING AND DETERMINING BATTERY CHARGE LEVEL, STATE OF CHARGE (SOC), BATTERY FUNCTIONS IN THE NATURE OF VOLTS, CURRENT (AMPS), AND POWER, SLEW RATE, DEPTH OF DISCHARGE, CHARGE AND DISCHARGE RATES, AND OPERATING TEMPERATURE; BATTERY CHARGING DEVICES, NAMELY, BATTERY CHARGERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DIGITAL CONTROL, DATA ACQUISITION AND SIMULATION FOR TESTING, MONITORING, PRODUCTION, PRODUCTION VALIDATION, ENDURANCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF POWERTRAIN, BATTERY PACK AND BATTERY CELLS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN BATTERY MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SIMULATION INCLUDING BATTERY CELL INFORMATION SIMULATION, BATTERY PACK THERMAL INFORMATION SIMULATION, NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES SIMULATION, DISCONNECT ON CRASH OR OTHER EMERGENCY SIMULATION, DIGITAL MESSAGE TRAFFIC SIMULATION | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |