USPTO serial 85353486
OFFERING FAMILIES CHOICE IN QUALITY EARLY LEARNING & CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OFFERING FAMILIES CHOICE IN QUALITY EARLY LEARNING & CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bonnie D. Headley
BONNIE D. HEADLEY BENNETT JONES LLP855 - 2ND STREET S.W.4500 BANKERS HALL EASTCALGARY, ALBERTA, T2P4K7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Referrals to specialists in the areas of nutrition, speech pathology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy and mental health | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction for children at the primary and elementary level; providing kindergarten classroom instruction; education services, namely, providing seminars, classes and workshops in the field of parenting, child development and special needs educations; summer camps, day camps, holiday camps and field trips for children in the field of points of interest and local attractions, namely, the zoo, science exhibitions and community buildings; educational programs in the fields of dance, music, storytelling and puppet shows; providing a website containing information relating to childhood education programs, educational activities, homework and family education programs; tutoring services, namely, providing assistance to children to enhance educational skills in the area of reading, writing, mathematics, test preparation, homework and studying; operation of schools at the pre-school and elementary level | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Daycare and childcare services; providing employers with childcare programs for employees | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services in the field of nutrition, speech pathology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy and mental health; medical and psychological counseling in the areas of social, emotional, cognitive and physical development of children | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Edleun, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named OFFERING FAMILIES CHOICE IN QUALITY EARLY LEARNING & CARE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |