CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CHOMPS

USPTO serial 85365529

CHOMPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOMPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Noe

Michael E. Noe Munck Wilson Mandala LLPP.O. Drawer 800889Docket ClerkDallas, TX 75380-0889

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Candy-based and grain-based edible eating utensils, namely, candy-based edible chopsticks, grain-based edible chopsticks, candy-based edible toothpicks and grain-based edible toothpicksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 18, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 11, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 11, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 8, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 2, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance