Drawing for TECHCELERATOR

USPTO serial 85371047

TECHCELERATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHCELERATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald J. Kisicki, Esq.

RONALD J. KISICKI, ESQ. WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP2 STATE ST STE 300ROCHESTER, NY 14614-1396UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate services, namely leasing and management of commercial property, offices and office spaceACTIVEApr 23, 2009
041Providing facilities for others for use in conducting educational training, classroom instruction and mentoring on a wide range of business and other related topicsACTIVEApr 23, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 7, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 7, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 16, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 16, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 16, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 18, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance