Drawing for FOLD-N-LOCK

USPTO serial 85381257

FOLD-N-LOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOLD-N-LOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry L. Haley

BARRY L. HALEY MALIN, HALEY, DIMAGGIO, BOWEN, & LHOTA,1936 S ANDREWS AVEFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316-2859UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Retractable truck bed coverACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 18, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 18, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 20, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 19, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 8, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 8, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 8, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance