Drawing for PEPTALK

USPTO serial 85419347

PEPTALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEPTALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric P. Ashenberg, Esq.

4712 Admiralty Way, #1110Marina Del Rey, CA 90292UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing communication services which allows users to schedule hobbies, games, activities and events over a broad platform of social communication tools; Development of marketing strategies, concepts and tactics, namely, online community building and digital word of mouth communications; Dissemination of scheduling and managing training courses and programs for others via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 21, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 2012CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 2, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance